Reverse Perspective

Reverse perspective is a system of spatial representation in which receding parallel edges appear to diverge rather than converge as they extend into pictorial depth.

In ordinary linear perspective, receding lines move towards one or more vanishing points situated within or around the image. In reverse perspective, the apparent direction of convergence is reversed: lines spread apart as they recede, as though their vanishing point were positioned in front of the picture and towards the viewer.

Reverse perspective is also called inverse perspective, inverted perspective or divergent perspective. It is sometimes called Byzantine perspective because of its association with Byzantine and Orthodox Christian art, although this term can be misleading because Byzantine images employ several different methods of organising space. (MIT Press Direct)

What Is Reverse Perspective?

Reverse perspective occurs when spatially parallel edges are represented as becoming farther apart as they recede into the image.

A table, building, platform or book may therefore appear wider at its more distant end than at the end nearest the viewer. Surfaces that would normally diminish into depth may instead expand or open outwards.

This produces an image that appears to project towards the observer rather than withdraw behind the picture surface.

The system can be understood geometrically by extending the diverging lines forwards from the image. Instead of meeting at a vanishing point behind the picture plane, they would meet at an imaginary point in front of it, on the viewer’s side.

In historical artworks, however, reverse perspective is not always applied as a single mathematically consistent projection. It may occur locally within individual objects or coexist with parallel projection, multiple viewpoints and other spatial arrangements. (MIT Press Direct)

How Reverse Perspective Works

Consider a rectangular table whose long sides extend away from the observer.

In ordinary one-point perspective:

the sides of the table converge as they recede;
the distant end appears narrower;
the table diminishes towards a vanishing point within the image.

In reverse perspective:

the sides diverge as they recede;
the distant end may appear wider;
the implied convergence point lies in front of the picture;
more than one side of the object may become visible.

The resulting form may appear to turn outwards or unfold towards the observer.

Reverse perspective therefore reverses the directional organisation of conventional convergent perspective. It does not simply turn the picture upside down or reverse its left and right sides.

Reverse Perspective and Linear Perspective

The fundamental distinction lies in the direction taken by receding parallel lines.

Linear perspective

In linear perspective:

receding parallel lines converge;
vanishing points normally lie within or around the image;
equal objects generally appear smaller with increasing distance;
the scene is constructed in relation to a fixed viewpoint.

Reverse perspective

In reverse perspective:

receding parallel lines diverge;
the implied vanishing point lies in front of the image;
distant parts of an object may be represented as wide as, or wider than, nearer parts;
the image may appear to open towards the observer.

Both systems organise spatial directions, but they produce opposing graphical effects.

Reverse Perspective and Parallel Perspective

Reverse perspective should not be confused with parallel perspective or parallel projection.

In convergent linear perspective, receding lines move closer together.

In parallel projection, receding lines remain parallel.

In reverse perspective, receding lines move farther apart.

The three arrangements can therefore be summarised as:

Linear perspective: convergence into depth
Parallel projection: neither convergence nor divergence
Reverse perspective: divergence into depth

An image may combine these arrangements, especially when different objects or architectural features are constructed independently.

Does Reverse Perspective Make Distant Objects Larger?

Reverse perspective is sometimes described as a system in which distant objects become larger rather than smaller. This can occur, but it should not be treated as a rule applying uniformly to every part of every image.

The most characteristic feature is the divergence of receding directions. One end of an object may expand as it recedes while figures, buildings and other elements elsewhere in the same composition follow different scale relationships.

Reverse perspective may therefore operate locally. A throne, table or building may show divergent edges even though the overall composition still uses overlap, vertical placement or diminution to suggest depth.

It is more accurate to identify the construction of each form than to assume that the entire image follows a single reverse projection.

Reverse Perspective in Byzantine and Orthodox Art

Reverse perspective is particularly associated with Byzantine icons, medieval Russian icons and later Orthodox Christian image-making.

Architectural forms, thrones, tables, books and platforms may be shown with receding edges that spread towards the viewer. Several sides of an object can consequently become visible at once.

This spatial arrangement differs from Renaissance linear perspective, which generally organises a scene around a fixed external observer and a coherent set of vanishing points.

Writers on icon theory have interpreted reverse perspective as making the sacred image appear to address or encompass the observer. Rather than inviting the viewer to look through the picture as though it were a window, the image appears to project its space towards the viewer. (Orthodox Arts Journal)

These theological interpretations are important, but they should not be applied mechanically to every Byzantine or Orthodox image. Reverse perspective is only one of several spatial strategies used in icon painting, and scholars differ over how the term should be defined and how deliberately its geometrical effects were constructed. (MIT Press Direct)

Multiple Viewpoints

Many images associated with reverse perspective do not represent the scene from one fixed viewpoint.

A table may reveal its upper surface, front, sides and distant end more fully than would be possible from a single optical position. Buildings may be turned differently from one another, and separate parts of a composition may appear to be seen from different directions.

This can produce a synthetic or composite view assembled from several observations.

The image does not necessarily reproduce what a stationary eye would see at one instant. Instead, it may communicate what the artist knows about the object, what needs to be shown, or how the different elements relate conceptually.

Pavel Florensky’s influential 1920 essay, Reverse Perspective, connected the system with a mobile or synthetic mode of seeing rather than a single immobile viewpoint. His interpretation later became central to discussions of space in Russian icon painting. (Cambridge University Press)

Why Use Reverse Perspective?

Reverse perspective can perform several different functions.

To reveal more of an object

Divergent construction can show several faces or surfaces simultaneously. A table, throne or architectural structure can be made more visually informative than it would appear from one fixed viewpoint.

To direct the image towards the observer

Forms may appear to expand out of pictorial depth and towards the viewer, strengthening the relationship between the image and the space in front of it.

To emphasise symbolic rather than optical relationships

The importance, identity or function of an object may take precedence over its appearance from a single viewpoint.

To unify separate areas of a composition

Different objects can be opened towards the viewer even when they occupy different positions within the scene.

To challenge conventional pictorial space

Modern artists may use divergent perspective deliberately to question the assumptions of fixed-viewpoint linear perspective.

These functions are not mutually exclusive, and their relevance varies between periods, traditions and individual works.

Is Reverse Perspective an Error?

Reverse perspective should not automatically be treated as failed linear perspective.

Some divergent drawings may arise from intuitive construction, unfamiliarity with convergent perspective or the difficulty of imagining how a three-dimensional form projects onto a flat surface. Experimental research has found that modern participants sometimes draw cubes and other forms with divergent edges even when asked to represent ordinary spatial appearance. (PubMed)

In established artistic traditions, however, repeated and organised use of divergent forms can become a meaningful representational convention. It may allow artists to communicate spatial, narrative or symbolic relationships that conventional linear perspective would suppress.

A particular example should therefore be assessed in context. Divergence may be:

accidental;
intuitive;
conventional;
compositional;
symbolic;
perceptually motivated;
or deliberately experimental.

The presence of divergent lines alone does not establish why they were used.

Reverse Perspective and Visual Perception

Reverse perspective does not normally reproduce the geometrical image formed by an ordinary fixed eye or camera.

Nevertheless, certain perceptual circumstances can make parallel or convergent forms appear less stable than elementary perspective theory suggests. Viewing position, eye movement, peripheral vision, knowledge of object shape and the integration of successive observations can all influence spatial experience.

This may help explain why divergent constructions can remain visually intelligible even when they contradict standard central projection.

A viewer does not perceive the image merely as a collection of projected lines. The mind also interprets surfaces, objects, orientations, overlaps and familiar forms.

Reverse perspective can exploit this distinction between strict geometrical projection and the broader processes of visual understanding.

Reverse Perspective in Modern Art

Reverse and divergent spatial constructions reappeared in modern art as artists questioned fixed-viewpoint Renaissance perspective.

Cubist works fragmented objects and combined several viewpoints within one image. Other modern artists used divergent constructions to expand pictorial space, reveal multiple sides of objects or involve the observer more directly.

David Hockney has repeatedly discussed and employed reverse perspective. He relates it to movement, changing viewpoints and the limitation of treating the observer as a fixed point outside the image. Hockney has also acknowledged the importance of Florensky’s essay to his thinking about perspective. (The New Yorker)

Modern applications need not imitate Byzantine icons. Reverse perspective can be used experimentally in painting, drawing, illustration, stage design, digital imagery and spatial installations.

Reverse Perspective and Forced Perspective

Reverse perspective should also be distinguished from forced perspective.

Forced perspective manipulates the actual or represented sizes and positions of objects to make them appear nearer, farther, larger or smaller than they are.

Reverse perspective concerns the direction and organisation of receding lines.

A forced-perspective scene may use ordinary convergence, while a reverse-perspective image may contain no forced-scale illusion. The two systems can be combined, but they describe different processes.

Related Terms

Several names have been applied to reverse perspective:

Inverse perspective

A widely used alternative term, particularly in discussions of icon painting.

Inverted perspective

Emphasises the reversal of ordinary convergent construction.

Divergent perspective

Describes the visible spreading apart of receding lines and is often the clearest geometrical term.

Byzantine perspective

Refers to the system’s association with Byzantine art, but can imply too narrowly that all Byzantine spatial representation operates in this way.

Negative perspective

Occasionally used in historical and theoretical writing, although its meaning may vary.

The term reverse perspective is retained here because it is the most widely recognisable general name. Where geometry is the primary concern, divergent perspective may be more precise.

Reverse Perspective within the Wider Field

Reverse perspective demonstrates that perspective is not limited to one-point, two-point or three-point linear construction.

It belongs to a wider family of processes through which space can be projected, organised, interpreted and represented.

These include:

central projection;
parallel projection;
divergent projection;
multiple-viewpoint representation;
composite perspective;
curvilinear projection;
optical imaging;
visual and perceptual perspective.

Reverse perspective is therefore not merely the opposite of linear perspective. It is an important example of how different image systems embody different relationships between the object, the picture and the observer.

Key Points

Reverse perspective represents receding parallel lines as diverging rather than converging.

Its implied vanishing point lies in front of the image, towards the viewer.

It is particularly associated with Byzantine and Orthodox icons but is not the only spatial system used in those traditions.

Reverse perspective may reveal several sides of an object, combine multiple viewpoints or project pictorial space towards the observer.

It should not automatically be interpreted as an error or an unsuccessful attempt at linear perspective.

Its meaning and function depend upon the image, artistic tradition and historical context.

Continue Exploring

Basic Perspective Drawing
Linear Perspective
Parallel Perspective
Graphical Perspective
Mathematical Perspective
Curvilinear Perspective
Dictionary of Perspective

Explore Theory

Explore the principal theories, classifications, types, forms, geometries, spatial concepts and visual phenomena of perspective.